top of page

The Tikkun Project

Previous Lesson
Next Lesson
Back to Unit

Lesson

2

Introducing the Challenge and the Core Text

Concept

A meaningful response to a social problem requires clear criteria for what counts as an effective action and ancient ethical wisdom can supply criteria as rigorous as anything a class would derive from scratch.

Focus Question

How can we decide what kinds of actions have the greatest positive impact? What does an ancient text about giving have to teach us about designing a modern action plan?

Knowledge & Understanding Goals

Language, Strand A (Literacy Connections and Applications), A1 — Transferable Skills, Grade 4: Apply critical thinking to evaluate ideas and evidence, and to construct and justify a position using criteria.
Mathematics, Financial Literacy Strand F, Grade 4: Demonstrate an understanding of the value of money and how it can be used to support well-being, considering personal and community-level decisions.

Thinking & Learning Skills

ATL — Thinking Skills: Generating criteria collaboratively, then testing those criteria against an authoritative source and revising them.
ATL — Communication: Constructing an argument and justifying a position with reasons, orally and in writing.
Learner Profile: Principled (integrity, responsibility); Thinkers (applying critical thinking to reach reasoned, ethical decisions).

Context

Lesson 1 gave students a shared definition of poverty and a bank of questions. This lesson pivots to evaluating responses to poverty: it introduces the Critical Challenge and grounds the class's evaluative criteria in Rambam's Ladder of Tzedakah the unit's core text, which recurs via the Ranking Ladder organizer for the rest of the unit.

Lesson Outline

INTRODUCE THE CRITICAL CHALLENGE AND LIST INITIAL IDEAS

Explain that the class will create an action plan to help alleviate some of the impacts of poverty on individuals in the community. The plan needs to: have the greatest possible positive impact; be feasible to implement; be an action whose impact can be measured.

Ask: "If we were going to implement a plan today, what should we do?" Divide the class into two groups; each lists 5 ways the class might help reduce the impacts of poverty (buying someone a sandwich, tzedakah box, loaning money/supplies, donating toward schooling, food bank donations, volunteering, teaching others about poverty). List all ideas visibly. Give each group 3 index cards; groups select their top 3 ideas and complete a justification frame: "____ is a good way for our class to help reduce the impacts of poverty because ____." Groups share their top three and reasoning.


CREATING CRITERIA TO IDENTIFY THE BEST PRACTICES IN GIVING

Ask students to complete: "The best actions to reduce the impacts of poverty are actions that…" (Likely answers: help someone earn more money; meet basic needs; help for longer than a one-time gift.)

Before introducing Rambam, read Deuteronomy 15:7–8 — "Open your hand to your poor and needy kinsman." Ask: Rambam lived almost 1,000 years after this verse was written. What do you think he was trying to figure out, starting from this one line?

Provide the text: Rambam's Eight Levels of Giving (Mishneh Torah, Matnot Aniyim 10:7–14), highest to lowest, ending with helping a person become self-sufficient at the top.

Discussion questions: Why is providing a job at the top of the list? Why was Rambam concerned about whether giver and receiver know each other? Why is giving too little better than giving unwillingly?

Explain that Rambam's ranking suggests good actions: provide adequate support; respect the dignity of the receiver; work on the root cause. Add these to the criteria list and let students revise.

Give each student a blank Ranking Ladder organizer (the unit's core organizer, used throughout). Students rank the class's original brainstormed ideas against the revised criteria, highest-impact at the top, and write a one-sentence justification for their top choice as an exit task.

Notes for Teaching and Evaluation

Structured Consensus Building (index-card justification frame): forces groups to externalize their reasoning, not just their preference — which is exactly what gets tested against Rambam's text a few minutes later.

Deuteronomy 15:7–8 as a bridge text: gives students the root text Rambam's ranked list is actually built on, rather than presenting his ladder as if it appeared from nowhere — and it's a genuine, previously-unused text in the unit.

Ranking Ladder: the unit's core organizer, used throughout — establishing it here means every later lesson can reuse it without re-teaching the tool.

bottom of page