The Tikkun Project
Lesson
5
Collaborative Curating
Concept
Presenting many individual contributions as a coherent whole requires its own set of curatorial decisions, and those decisions themselves can either reflect or undermine the unit's thesis about diversity as strength.
Focus Question
What is the best way to organize and present our collective work so that it truly shows diversity as a strength?
Knowledge & Understanding Goals
Language, Strand A (Literacy Connections and Applications), Grade 8: Collaborate to organize and present multimodal work for an authentic audience, justifying organizational choices.
Thinking & Learning Skills
ATL — Social Skills: Collaborative decision-making.
ATL — Thinking Skills: Evaluating organizational options against the Critical Challenge's criteria.
Learner Profile: Communicators, Open-Minded.
Context
The unit's synthesis and presentation lesson brings together every student's individual piece from Lesson 4 into the single Collaborative Educational Experience named in the Critical Challenge.
Lesson Outline
LEARNING FROM EACH OTHER
Students (from the partner school, the exchanged-material set, or all working from the single shared guest interview, depending on which Critical Challenge variant is running) come together to share their work. To make thoughtful curatorial choices, the whole group needs a working understanding of all the material to be presented — the sharing format depends on the chosen experience: for a pot-luck banquet, students describe the dish they'll bring and its cultural or traditional significance; for a poetry anthology, each student shares their poem.
MAKING CURATORIAL CHOICES
After reviewing all the work, students form small groups to discuss and decide the best way to organize it to meet the Critical Challenge's criteria. Remind students of the Set game from Lesson 1: sets can be grouped by similarity or by difference, and this same choice applies here. Ask: which of the following would most effectively communicate how diversity contributes to a community's strength and resilience — work arranged randomly; arranged alphabetically by contributor; grouped by diverse responses to a single shared theme; grouped by class or school; or another approach the group proposes? For this specific body of work, what would make a great "Set"?
SHARING WITH AN AUDIENCE
Invite guests to the event, and finalize plans for presenting the curated experience.
Notes for Teaching and Evaluation
Offering a concrete menu of organizing options (random, alphabetical, theme-grouped, school-grouped, other) rather than an open "how should we organize this?" gives students a genuine decision to evaluate and defend, instead of an unbounded brainstorm that's hard to resolve as a group.
Explicitly reconnecting to Set here — rather than treating curation as a brand-new skill — reinforces that the unit's central metaphor was never just about a card game; it's a real tool for a real decision students are making at the end of the unit.